..

మాలిక్యులర్ మరియు జెనెటిక్ మెడిసిన్

మాన్యుస్క్రిప్ట్ సమర్పించండి arrow_forward arrow_forward ..

వాల్యూమ్ 14, సమస్య 4 (2020)

చిన్న కమ్యూనికేషన్

Analysis of Polymorphisms Associated with type 2 Diabetes in the Kazakh Population

Benberin V, Voshchenkova T, Abildinova G, Borovikova A and Nagimtayeva A

The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) underlines the urgent need for proactive strategies to prevent and control T2D. A fairly large number of studies show that T2D is a complex metabolic disease caused by lifestyle, environment and genetic factors. Thus, the study of a genetic predisposition to diabetes is of great importance. At the same time, one of the most effective methods, besides genome-wide researches, is the use of polymorphic markers of various candidate genes, i.e., those genes, protein products of which (enzymes, regulatory proteins and peptides, structural proteins) can be potentially involved in the development of this disease. The study of genetic markers of type 2 diabetes association is relevant worldwide. The aim of this study was to search for genetic markers associated with the development of T2D in individuals of the Kazakh population.

పరిశోధన వ్యాసం

Chromosomal Mosaicism in Cleavage Stage Embryos vs. Blastocyst Stage Embryos

El-Bisari S, Alyounis D, Sayed W and Uppal S

Introduction: Chromosomal mosaicism is characterized by the presence of more than one chromosomally different cell line in an individual. Preimplantation chromosomal mosaicism is characterized by the presence of a mixture of chromosomally different cell lines in an embryo. Studies show that mosaicism for whole chromosomes (aneuploidies) in one or more cells (blastomeres) occurred in more than 75% of cleavage stage embryos, whilst 3%-24% of blastocyst stage embryos are chromosomally mosaic.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to standardize and validate a Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) method for comprehensive chromosome testing for aneuploidies and to study the level of mosaicism in cleavages stage vs. blastocyst stage embryos.

Methods: The validation involved a retrospective blind assessment of whole genome amplification (WGA) products from 14 cleavages stage embryo biopsies (blastomeres), 6 blastocyst stage embryo biopsies (TE), in addition to their 20 discarded blastocyst stage whole embryos. 42.8% of the cleavages stage embryos showed mosaicism, whilst results between the trophectoderm (TE) biopsies (TEB) and their whole embryos at blastocyst stage showed total concordance as no mosaicism was observed. NGS sensitivity and specificity for calling aneuploidy was found to be 100%.

Conclusion: This is the first study reporting preclinical validation and accuracy assessment of the Ion semiconductor sequencing technology in studying the level of mosaicism in cleavage stage and TE biopsies blastocyst stage embryos vs. their whole embryos.

The high level of mosaicism in cleavages stage embryos compared to blastocyst stage embryos does not recommend the PGT-A to be performed on cleavage stage embryos. The NGS proved to be a robust methodology in clinical application of PGT-A.

పరిశోధన వ్యాసం

గ్లూకోకార్టికాయిడ్-ప్రేరిత డయాబెటిస్ మెల్లిటస్ అభివృద్ధికి బయోమార్కర్స్ - ఒక జీవక్రియ-ఆధారిత అంచనా నమూనా

???????????? CK, ????????? JF, ??????? FD, Færgeman NJ, ???????? HH, ?????? F, ?????????? B, ????‌?????? UP ????? ??????????‌???? PL

???????: ??????????????????-??????? ????????? ????????? (GIDM) ????? ?????????????????? (GC) ??????? ????? ???????? ???????????, ??? ??????? ?????? ????? ????????? ?????????? ?????? ????? ???????, ????? GC?? ??????? ??????????? ????????? GIDM?? ????????? ?????. ????? ??????? ????? ???? 2 ?????????‌?? ????? ???? ????????? ?????? ??????? GIDM?? ????? ?????. ??????? ???????? ????????? ????????? ???? 2 ?????????‌?? ????? ????????? ???????? ???????? ???????????. ??? GIDM?? ???? ???? ???????. ? ??????? ????? ???????? ??????? ???? ?????? GC?? ??????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ???????? ???????? GIDM ??????????? ????? ??????? ??? ???????????.
????????? ????? ????????: ???????? ?????????????-???? ???????????????? (LC-MS) ?????? ????‌?????????? ??????????????‌?? ??-???? GC (> 100 mg ?????????????? ???????????)?? ??????? ?????????? ???? ????? ??????? 116 ???? ????? ????? ???? ????????????????. ????????? ???? ????‌????‌?? ????? 3 ????? ????-??? ???????? ?????????????. 52 ???? ?????? GIDM?? ????????? ?????? ????? 64 ???? ??????? (???????? ?????). ?????????? ????????? ????? ????? ???????????? ????? ??????????????? ????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ?????????? ?????? ???? ??????? ???? ?????? (n = 6) ????? ???? ??????? (n = 107) ???? ????? ????? ?????? ????????????????.
??????? ????? ????: ????? ?????????? ???? ?????????? GIDM ??????????? ????????????. ? ?????????? ????????? ??????????? ???????????????. ????-?????????? ?????? GIDM?? ????? ????????????? ????? ??? T2DM?? ??????? ?????? ????? ???????? ???????. ??? T2DM ????? GIDM ????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ?????????? ?????? ????????. ?? ??????? ????? ??????????? ?????????? ???? ???????, ????? ?????????? ????? ????????‌? ?????? ????????? ???????????, ??????????????? ??????????‌? ????? ???????????????, ? ??????????‌??? ?????????????. ???????: T2DM???? ?????? ???????? ???????? GIDM?? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ???????????. GIDM T2DM ????? ???????? ??????????????? ????? ????????? ?????????? ??? ?????? ????????. ????, ????????? ???????????? ????? GIDM ??????? ???? ??????? ????????? ?????? ????? ?? ???? ???????????.

పరిశోధన వ్యాసం

మైకోఫెనోలేట్ మోఫెటిల్‌పై పాలీమార్ఫిజమ్‌ల ప్రభావం - మూత్రపిండ మార్పిడి చేసిన పిల్లలలో ప్రేరేపిత డయేరియా

???????? ??, ?? ???????? ??, ??????? ??, ???????? ??, ????????? ??, ?????????? ?? ????? ??????-????????? ?

?????????: ????????? ???????? ????? ???????? ??????? ????????? ???????????? ???????? (MMF) ????????????? ???? ???????? ??????????? ? ??????? ????? ???????.

????????: UGT1A8, UGT1A9, UGT2B7, ABCC2, IMPDH1 ????? IMPDH2 ???????? ????? ????????, ????????? ??????? ????????? ????? ?????????????‌?? ????????????????. ?????????? ????????? ????????? ????? ?????????? ???????.

???????: ???? ???? ????????? ???????? ?????? ???????????? ????? 28/83 (33%) ?????? MMF ??????????? ????????? ????????? ???? ????-??? ?????? ?????????-?????? ??????????? EC-MPS?? ??????. ????????????? ??????????, IMPDH2 IVS7 + 10 T>C ????????‌?? ????? ???? ABCC2 -24CC ??????-???? ??????? ??????? ????? ??????? ???????? ???????? ???? .

???????: IMPDH2 (IVS7+10T>C) ????? ABCC2 (c.-24C>T) MMF?? ??????? ?????? ???????? ????????? ?????? ???? ????????????.

పరిశోధన వ్యాసం

బాసిల్లస్ సబ్‌టిలిస్‌లో మినీ ఇంటెయిన్ మధ్యవర్తిత్వం వహించిన హ్యూమన్ బేసిక్ ఫైబ్రోబ్లాస్ట్ గ్రోత్ ఫ్యాక్టర్ యొక్క వ్యక్తీకరణ

?? KC, ??????? WY, ?? JCY, ???? MC ????? ????? CSK

????????? ????????? ( ??. ????????? ) ????? ????????? ????????? ?????????? ??????????? ?????? ???????. ???????????, ???? ?????????? ???????? ?????? ?????????? ??????? ??????? B. ???‌??????‌?? ??????????? ????????‌? ???????? ???? ?????. '???????? ????????' ??? ???? ???????? ????????‌??, ???? ??????? ?????????? ????? ???????????? ????????????? ????? ??????, ????? ?????? ???????‌??? ???????????? ????????‌? ???????????? ???????????? ??????????? ???? ( E. ???? )?? ??????????????, ????? ???? ?????? ???? ??????? ????. B. ???‌??????‌?? ???????? ?????????? ???? ??????‌? ????? ????????????. ? ????????????‌??, B. ???‌?????? ???????? ????? ??-?????‌???? ???? ???-????????‌??? ??????? ???????? ???? ??????????? . ????????, pECBS1-H6-DnaE-bFGF, ?????? 6x ????-?????? (H6) ????? ?????? ?????????????? ?????? ????????? (bFGF) ?????? Asp DnaE (intein) ????? N- ????? C- ?????????‌?? ?????? ??????????. ???? ????????? ??? ??? ???????? ???????? ?????? ?????????? ????? bFGF ????? ???-????????‌??? ???????? ????? ????????? ????? ?????? . ???????????, ???????? ?????? ????? ????? ???????? ???????? ??????? ??? ??????????????? ??????? bFGF ????? 113 mg L -1 ????????? . ??????? ????????? ?????????? intein Asp DnaE?? ????????? ? ?????? ???? ?????????? ????? ??????? ????? ??????????? ????????? ???? ????? ????????????.

ఇండెక్స్ చేయబడింది

arrow_upward arrow_upward