Dimitri L. Bertazzi, Johan-Owen De Craene and Sylvie Friant
Mutations in the MTM1 gene, encoding the phosphoinositide phosphatase myotubularin, are responsible for the X-linked centronuclear myopathy (XLCNM) or X-linked myotubular myopathy (XLMTM). The MTM1 gene was first identified in 1996 and its function as a PtdIns3P and PtdIns(,5)P2 phosphatase was discovered in 2000. In recent years, very important progress has been made to set up good models to study MTM1 and the XLCNM disease such as knockout or knockin mice, the Labrador Retriever dog, the zebrafish and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These helped to better understand the cellular function of MTM1 and of its four conserved domains: PH-GRAM (Pleckstrin Homology-Glucosyltransferase, Rab-like GTPase Activator and Myotubularin), RID (Rac1-Induced recruitment Domain), PTP/DSP (Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase/Dual-Specificity Phosphatase) and SID (SET-protein Interaction Domain). This review presents the cellular function of human myotubularin MTM1 and its yeast homolog yeast protein Ymr1, and the role of MTM1 in the centronuclear myopathy (CNM) disease.
????? ???? ????? ????????? ????????????
????????? ???????? ???????? ????????? ???????? ?????? ???????????? ????? ???? ????????? ????????????, 20-25% ???? ?????? ??? ????????? ????????? ?????????, ????????? ??????? ??????? ????????????. BCR-ABL1 ?????? ?????? ????? ???????????? ?????????, ???? ??????? ????? ????? ???? ????????? ???????? ????????? ????? ??????? ????????? ???????? ?????? ???????????? ????? ????? ???????????? ???????? ???? ????????? ?????? ??????? ????? ????. ??????? ????????? ???????? ???????????? ???????? ????? ???????? ????????? ???????????? ??? ????????? ????? ?????? ????????? ?????? ???????????? ????? ??????. ????? BCR-ABL1-?????? ????????? ???????? ???????? ????????? ???????????????.
???????????? ?????, ?????????? ??????? ??????, ??????? ????????? ????????, ????? ??? ?????? ????? ???? ??? ?????????
???????? ???????? ????? ???????????????? ????????? ??????? ??????? ????????? ?? ????????? (RCC) ?? ???????? ????????? ???????????. ?????????? ????????? (CT) ????? ?????????? ?????????? ???????? (MRI)?? ??? ???????? ??????????? ???????? ???????? ??????? ????????? ????? ???? ?????????? ????????? ???????? ????????; ???? ??? ???????? ?????? ????????? ????? ????? RCC?? ???????????????? ???? ??????????, ?????????? ????? ??????????????? ?????????? ???????????. ??? ????????? ????-????????? ??????????????? ??????????? ???????? ????????? ???????????? ????????? ??????????????. ????????-?????? ???????? ??????? ????? ??????? ?????? ?????? RCC ???????????? ???????? ??????????????, ??? ? ??????? ????? ??????????????? ??????????????? ?????? ?????????????? ??????????? ???????????. ? ????? ?????????? ??????? ????? ????? ???????????? ????????????? ???????? ???????? ???????????????. ??????, ????????? ???????????, ????????? ??????? ????????? ????? ????????? ??? ????????????? ???????? ?????????????? ????? ????????????????????.
?????? ????????????, ?????? ??????, ????? ?????????, ????-?????? ??????? ????? ??????? ????????
CDKL5 ????? SMARCA2 ???????????? ?????? ???????????? ????????? ??????? ????????? ????????? (?????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ??) ???????????? ????? ??????? ???? ?????????.. ?????? ????????????, ? ????? ???????????? ???? ???????? ????????? ???????? ????????? ???????????? ????? ??????? ????????? ??????CGH ?????? ????????????. ? ??????? ????? ?????????, ???? ????????? ??????? ????????? ????????? ??????? ????????? ?????? ????? ???????????? ????????? ???????????? ????? ??????? ????????? ?????? ?????.
????? ?. ??????, ????????? ??. ???????, ????? ????, ?????? ??????-????????? ????? ???? ?????
?????? ???? ????????? ?????? ?? (AF) ?????????, ?????? ????? ?????? ??????? ????????? ????? ?????? ???????? ???????? ????? ??????. ?????? ??? ?????? ???????? ?????????, AF ????? ???????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ????????? ?????????, 2010?? 2.26 ???????? ???? ????????? ????????????, ??? 2050 ?????? 12 ????????? ???????????? ????? ????????? [1]. ???????? ???????? ???? ??????? ??????? AF ????? ????? ???? ????????????, ????? ?????? ??????? ????????? ????? ???? [1]. 2005 ????????????, AF ??????? ???? US ???????????? ????????? $6.65 ???????? ????? ??? ????? ?????????.
???????? ?????
DNA (???????? 5-) ?????? ??????????????? 1 (DNMT1) ??????????? ???? ??????????????? DNA ????? ????????? ??????? ???????? ???? ????? ?????? ???????? ????????? ??????? ???? ?????? ????????? ?????????????. ???? ???????????? DNA ????????? ????? ???????? ????? DNMT1 ????? ????????? ????????? ???????????? ?????????. DNMT1 ????? ????? ??????? DNA ???????????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ????? ??????. ? ????? ?????? DNMT1 ???????????? https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/genomics-of-colorectal-cancer-in-african-americans-2469-9853-1000133?? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ???????? ????????? ????????????. php?aid=80577 ??????? ???? ??????? ??????? ????????? ????? ???????????? ?????? ??????? ????????? ???????? DNA ????????? ????? ???????????? ????? ???????????????.
????????? ???? ??????, ?????? ????????? ?????????, ?????? ????????? ??????, ????? ????????? ?????????, ?????? ???????? ????????, ????? ?????????, ????????? ?????????, ?????? ????, ?????? ??????? ????? ????? ????????
?????? ????? ?????????: ??????????????? ??????????????? ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ???? ??????. ????????? ????????????, ??????????????? ????????? ????? ???????? ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ??????? ????? ????? 27 ???????????? ???????????? ?????????????. ? ??????? ??????? ???? ???????? ???????????? ??? ???????????? ???????????? ?????????. ?????????: ? ?????? ????? ??????? ????? ???????? ????????? ??????????????? ???? ?????????, ???????? ????? ???????????? ???????? ???????????????. ???? ACTC, GLA, MYBPC3, MYH6, MYH7, MYL2, MYL3, MYLK2, MYO6, PRKAG2, TCAP, TNN1, TNNI3, TNN2, TPM16 ????????? ?????? 592 ??????????????? ???????????????. ??????: ???? ??? ?????? ?? ???????????? ?????? 37 ???? ?????? ??????? ????? ???????? ????????? ????????????. Lys247Arg (K247R) ????????? 13 ???? ?????? ???????? (38.23%) ????????????, ?????? 3 ?????? ?? ???????????? ????, ????? ?????? ??????? ???????????? ???? ????? ?????? ????????? ????. ????????????, ?? ???? ???????????? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ?????. ?????? (???????????? ???????????????) ? ???????????? ???????????????. ?????????: ???? ???????????? ??????????????? ????? ??????? ?????? ????????? ???????????? ????????????, ????? ???????????? ????????? ???? ???????????? ????. ????????? ?? ??? 2 ???????????? K247R ????? ???????? ????????? ?????? ????? ??????? ???????????? ????????? ??????? ????????????.
????????? ?????????, ?????? ??????????????? ????? ?????? ????????
?? ??????? ???? ??? ????? ???? ?????? ????. ??????? ?????? ????? ????????? ????????? ???? ????? ?????? ?????????????????? ???? ?? ????????? ?? ????? ???? ????????? ???????? ???????? ???? ??? ???????????? ????? ????????? ???? ?????. ????????? ??????????????? ????? ????? ????????? ????? ????? ????? ???????????? ????? ???? ????? ???????? ????? ??? ????????? ???????????? ?????? ???????????? ?????????? ???????????? ????. ? ????????????, ?????? ????????? ???, ????????? ????? ????????? ????? ?????? ????????????????????? ???????????? ????? ???????? ??????? ???? ????????????. ?????? ???? ??????? ????? ???? ?????? ???????? ???? ????????? ???? ???????????? ?????? ???????? ???????????? ??????? ???? ???? ?????? ????????. ?????? ??????? ????????? ????? ? ???????? ????? ????????? ????????? ???????? ????? ???????? ???????????? ????????? ????????? ???? ?????? ??????.
?????? ?????????, ???? ????, ???? ?????????, ???????? ???, ????????? ???, ????????? ??????, ????? ?????, ?????? ????? ????? ????? EO ???-?????
?????? ???????? ????????? ????????? 1a (GHSR1a) ?????? ???????? (GH) ?????? ????? ???? ???????? ????? ??? ???????? ??????? ??? ???? ???????? ???????? ????????????. ???? ????? ???????? ?????????, ??????-?????????? 5'??? ??????????????? ??????? (5'UTR) ?????????????? ???????????????, ??????? 1 (DelR242)?? 3bp-?????? ????? GHSR1a ??????? ????? ????? ???? ?????????????????? (????????????, ??????????????? ??????? 5'UTR (GHSR1a); ??????????- ????????, ?????????????? (GHSR1b) ??. ???? 17 ??????? ((TG) ???????, ??????????????? GHSR1a ???????? ???????? ???????? 3- ????????? ?????: 4 ????????? ?.???????????????? ???????? 1,285 ???????? ???????????????????? ????????????? ??????????? 19-TG ????????? ????????????????????? ?GHSR1b ??????????? ?????????????? ????????? GHSR1a ????? GHSR1b ????? ???????????? ??????-????????? ????????? ???? ????????????. ?????? ?????? ???? ????? ???????????? ??????????????? GHSR1a mRNA ????????? ???? ????? ????? ???? ???? 10 ?????? ??????. ?????? ?????????, ?????????, ??????? ????? ????? ???? mRNA ???????????? 3 ???????????? ???????????? ???????: (1) ???????? GHSR1a mRNA ????????? ???????? ???????? ??????? ????? ??????? ????? ??????? ???? ???????? ???????; (2) ???????? GHSR1b mRNA ????????? ???????? ???????? ??????? ????? ???????? ???????? ???????; (3) ??????????????? GHSR1b mRNA ????????? ???????? ???? ???????? ??????.
Boris L Vaisman, Lita Freeman and Alan T Remaley
Development of New Animal Models of Atherosclerosis Atherosclerosis and complications associated with this pathology, such as coronary artery disease, remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the world [1]. Dyslipidemia is one of the main risk factors leading to development of the atherosclerosis [2,3]. Peripheral (non-hepatic) cells, including arterial and aortic cells, obtain cholesterol from either de novo synthesis or from uptake of plasma lipoproteins. To prevent atherosclerosis, excess cholesterol must be removed from cells. This process takes place through the reverse cholesterol transport pathway [4,5], a process whereby cells efflux excess cholesterol to HDL, which subsequently delivers cholesterol to the liver for excretion into the bile.
Gabriele Togliatto, Matteo Traversa, Alberto Orsello and Maria Felice Brizzi
Unacylated Ghrelin (UnAG) Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a major clinical problem and a significant health care cost worldwide [1]. PAD is the result of a progressive occlusion of the peripheral arteries driven by atherosclerosis [2]. This, in turn, leads to a gradual reduction of blood supply to the limb and the occurrence of symptoms ranging from intermittent claudication to critical limb ischemia [3]. Moreover, as PAD remains under-diagnosed for many years, muscle damage and ulceration are commonly found. PAD is a common vascular complication in diabetic individuals [4] and its incidence and prevalence are expected to increase due to the spread of diabetes and an aging population [5]. In particular, diabetic patients have a high risk of developing PAD which is more severe and diffuse than in nondiabetic patients [4]. Moreover, the presence of PAD in these patients is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality for cardiovascular diseases [1,4].
Amar Nagesh Kumar, Jupalle Nagiah Naidu, Uppala Stayanarayana and Medabalmi Anitha
Polycystic ovary syndrome is the most common endocrinal disorder and is associated with infertility. Insulin resistance is a key component in the pathogenesis of PCOS and the predisposition to Type 2 diabetes mellitus. The existing literature supports a strong basis of PCOS clusters in families. However, due to the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of PCOS and the lack of large cohort studies and identification of specific contributing genes to date have yielded only few conclusive results. Although several loci have been proposed as PCOS genes including CYP11A, the insulin gene, and a region near the insulin receptor, the strongest case can be made for the region near the insulin receptor gene. Insulin receptor substrates proteins (IRS) are critical for insulin mediated signal transduction in insulin target tissues. Several studies have shown that IRS-1 Gly972Arg polymorphism might be the factor causing susceptibility to Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and are associated with phenotypic features of
PCOS. In this article we reviewed the current status of the genetic analysis of insulin (INS), insulin receptor (INSR), insulin receptor substrate (IRS) in relation to polycystic ovary syndrome, an infertility disorder in females.
Zhen Wang, Peng F Bie, Tong L, Wu and Qing M Wu
Administration of live Brucella vaccine is required to prevent the spreadof ruminant brucellosisin affected livestock herds. This study optimized the mouse model to test the protective efficacy of live Brucella vaccine. To optimize the protective efficacy test procedure, the absolute infective doses were determined in mice as 10 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/mouse for B. melitensis 16M and 50 CFU/mouse for B. abortus 2308, which were then used as the challenge doses for the respective strains. The optimal vaccination doses of vaccine Brucellasuis S2 in mice were 102.25 CFU and 103.5 CFU/mouse, which could confer ≥ 80% protection in mice against challenge by B. melitensis 16M or B. abortus 2308, respectively. In addition, challenge with B. melitensis 16M or B. abortus 2308 should occur just at 3.63 weeks and 4.75 weeks post-inoculation, respectively. The protective efficacy test not only was more accurate and took less time but also was consistent with the evaluation index in host animals. Our study indicated that the mouse model could be used to test the protective efficacy of live Brucella vaccines during their production and development.
Perepechaeva M, Kolosova N and Grishanova A
Background: Etiology of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is poorly understood, although oxidative stress and environmental risk factors have been implicated. Recently, AhR (arylhydrocarbon receptor) and Nrf2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2) were considered as AMD candidate genes. Transcription products of the AhR-Nrf2 “gene battery” are important in mediating cellular response to oxidative stress. The animal model for AMD (senescence accelerated OXYS rats) was used. Ophthalmoscopy revealed no pathologic changes in OXYS rats’ retinas at the age of 1 month; however, at the age of 3 months, the first signs of retinopathy were recorded in the eyes of all animals tested. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the balance between prooxidizing (AhR-dependent) and antioxidant (Nrf2-dependent) systems plays a crucial role in the onset and/or progression of age-related retinopathy. Methods: In the retina of 1-, 3- and 12- month-old OXYS and Wistar rats mRNA levels of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, GSTA1, NQO1, ALDH3A1, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, AhR and Nrf2 genes were measured by qRT-PCR. Results: In the retinas of 1-month OXYS rats, the mRNA level of only AhR was reduced when compared with Wistar rats. At the age of 3 months, a decline in the mRNA levels was detected for CYP1A and CYP1A2, but not for CYP1B1 in OXYS rats. mRNA levels of Nrf2, were higher in OXYS rats when compared with Wistar rats. Levels of the genes that are regulated by AhR and Nrf2 (NQO1 and UGT1A6), were reduced when compared with Wistar rats, and GSTA1: mRNA level was increased. Conclusions: The data obtained allow us to conclude that the AhR-Nrf2 “gene battery” may be involved in the pathogenesis of retinopathy in the OXYS rats. One of the triggers for the starting of oxidative stress during the progression of retinopathy may be the inborn reduced level of AhR expression.
Fakhra Amin and Bilqees Bano
Cystatins are the thiol proteinases inhibitors of prime physiologic importance. They are ubiquitously present in mammalian body. They prevent unwanted proteolysis and play important role in several diseases. Regulation of cysteine proteinases and their inhibitors are of utmost importance in diseases like Alzheimer, amlyoid angiopathy and other neurodegenerative disease. Proteinase anti-proteinase imbalance accelerates disease progression. Amitriptylin an antidepressant helps to relieve depression and pain. It is often used to manage nerve pain resulting from cancer treatment. Such injury to nerves causes a burning, tingling sensation. This medication, usually given at bedtime, helps patients to sleep better
In this paper interaction of brain cystatin (BC) with Amytriptyline (AMY) has been studied by UV absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy. In the present study, the effect of drug has been studied to explore AMY induced changes in functional and structural integrity of the cystatin. The fluorescence quenching data is indicative of complex formation between the protein and drug which confirmed the binding of Amytriptyline with brain cystatin. Stern-Volmer analysis of Amytriptyline binding with brain cystatin indicates the presence of static component in the quenching mechanism. The thermodynamic parameters ΔG° (Free energy change) -36.966 KJ/mol indicated that both hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions played a major role in the binding of AMY with BC. Binding investigations give in this work, gives significant information about the conformational changes in cystatin due interaction with the drug.